Grier v. Client Services, Inc. et al
| Nicole Grier |
| John Does 1-25 and Client Services, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01920 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Nicole Grier: For Client Services, Inc. waiver sent on 10/11/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Client Services, Inc., John Does 1-25 - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2751397.) - filed by Nicole Grier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Client Services, Inc. on 10/9/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (myr) |
| Remark: Summons mailed to Philadelphia Office per filing party's request. (myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
