Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
| Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC |
| Panasonic Corporation of North America |
| 1:2019cv01921 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 21, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Panasonic Corporation of North America answer due 2/21/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/27/2019. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 21, 2020 - filed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. Panasonic Corporation of North America served on 11/4/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Wawrzyn filed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/29/2019. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Wawrzyn - filed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Panasonic Corporation of North America on 10/10/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. (lak) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 9,147,299 B2. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed with Jury Demand against Panasonic Corporation of North America - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2751814.) - filed by Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oritz & Associates Consulting, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
