O'Neal v. May et al
Wayne Scott O'Neal |
Christine Spanos, Warden Robert May, Dr. Edward Hendrix and Dr. Sheri L. McAfee-Garner |
1:2019cv01953 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Authorization by Wayne Scott O'Neal requesting Prison Business Office to disburse payments to the Clerk of the Court. (copy of assessment order and authorization to Prison Business Office) (amf) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Motion to Proceed IFP. Filing Fee of $350.00 Assessed. Plaintiff shall return the attached payment authorization within 30 days. Failure to return payment authorization shall result in dismissal of action without prejudice. (Copy to pltf. with Mag. Consent Form)(Notice of Compliance deadline set for 11/27/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/25/2019. (nmg) Modified on 10/29/2019 (nms). |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT - filed pursuant to 42:1983 against Edward Hendrix, Robert May, Sheri L. McAfee-Garner, Christine Spanos - filed by Wayne Scott O'Neal. (lak) |
Filing 2 Trust Fund Account Statement - filed by Wayne Scott O'Neal. (lak) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Wayne Scott O'Neal. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.