Aperture Net LLC v. U.S. Robotics Corporation
| Aperture Net LLC |
| U.S. Robotics Corporation |
| 1:2019cv02057 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 21, 2020 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: U.S. Robotics Corporation answer due 1/21/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/20/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to January 21, 2020 - filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 19, 2019 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: U.S. Robotics Corporation answer due 12/19/2019). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/19/2019. (nms)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 19, 2019 - filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02054-RGA, 1:19-cv-02055-RGA, 1:19-cv-02056-RGA, 1:19-cv-02057-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aperture Net LLC. U.S. Robotics Corporation served on 11/1/2019, answer due 11/22/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to U.S. Robotics Corporation on 10/30/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Aperture Net LLC. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 6,711,204 B2. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed with Jury Demand against U.S. Robotics Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2766475.) - filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aperture Net LLC v. U.S. Robotics Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aperture Net LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Robotics Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
