Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. MaxLinear, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Amino Communications LLC, Amino Technologies (US) LLC and MaxLinear, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv02125
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Colm F Connolly
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2020 Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,639,944; 6,760,376. (nmf)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SO ORDERED, re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC, (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/8/2020. (nmf)
January 7, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC as to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Brauerman, Stephen)
December 5, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily A. Letcher on behalf of Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (Letcher, Emily)
December 4, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement - filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: MaxLinear, Inc. answer due 1/10/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/4/2019. (fms)
November 22, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by which Defendants Amino Technologies (US) LLC and Amino Communications, LLC shall respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement (D.I. 1) to January 10, 2020 - filed by Amino Communications LLC, Amino Technologies (US) LLC. (Connolly, Arthur)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by which Defendants Amino Technologies (US) LLC and Amino Communications, LLC shall respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement (D.I. 1) to January 10, 2020 filed by Amino Technologies (US) LLC, Amino Communications LLC. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Amino Communications LLC answer due 1/10/2020; Amino Technologies (US) LLC answer due 1/10/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/22/2019. (fms)
November 20, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
November 14, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. Amino Technologies (US) LLC served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Brauerman, Stephen)
November 14, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. MaxLinear, Inc. served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Brauerman, Stephen)
November 14, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. Amino Communications LLC served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Brauerman, Stephen)
November 12, 2019 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,639,944; 6,760,376. (kmd)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd)
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Amino Communications LLC, Amino Technologies (US) LLC, MaxLinear, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2776296.) - filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd)
November 12, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Amino Communications LLC on 11/12/2019; Amino Technologies (US) LLC on 11/12/2019; MaxLinear, Inc. on 11/12/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (kmd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. MaxLinear, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Stephen B. Brauerman
Represented By: Emily A. Letcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amino Communications LLC
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amino Technologies (US) LLC
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MaxLinear, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?