AFX Technology Group International, Inc. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated
AFX Technology Group International, Inc. |
Microchip Technology Incorporated |
1:2019cv02131 |
November 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to January 22, 2020 filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/3/20. (ntl) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to January 22, 2020 - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Moyer, Jeffrey) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Holmes J. Hawkins, III for Microchip Technology Incorporated added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Microchip Technology Incorporated to answer, move or otherwise respond to AFX's Complaint to through and including January 8, 2020 filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/9/19. (ntl) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Holmes J. Hawkins, III - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Cragg, Tyler) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler E. Cragg on behalf of Microchip Technology Incorporated (Cragg, Tyler) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey L. Moyer on behalf of Microchip Technology Incorporated (Moyer, Jeffrey) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Holmes J. Hawkins, III filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/6/19. (ntl) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Microchip Technology Incorporated to answer, move or otherwise respond to AFX's Complaint to through and including January 8, 2020 - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Moyer, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by AFX Technology Group International, Inc.. (Pazuniak, George) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AFX Technology Group International, Inc.. Microchip Technology Incorporated served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Pazuniak, George) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by George Pazuniak (Pazuniak, George) |
Corporate Affiliates/Parents added per Disclosure Statement:. (Pazuniak, George) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,027,773. (lak) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Microchip Technology Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2777645.) - filed by AFX Technology Group International, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (lak) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Microchip Technology Incorporated on 11/13/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.