PogoTec, Inc. v. Opkix, Inc. et al
| PogoTec, Inc. |
| Opkix, Inc. and B8TA, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02166 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to B8TA, Inc. on 11/21/2019; Opkix, Inc. on 11/21/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by PogoTec, Inc. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,930,257 B2 ;10,185,163 B2 ;10,348,965 B2 ;10,481,417 B2. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against B8TA, Inc., Opkix, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2784252.) - filed by PogoTec, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
