Pivital IP LLC v. ActiveCampaign, LLC
| Pivital IP LLC |
| ActiveCampaign, LLC |
| 1:2019cv02176 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to January 27, 2020 filed by Pivital IP LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/12/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to January 27, 2020 - filed by Pivital IP LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Pivital IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02175-LPS, 1:19-cv-02176-LPS, 1:19-cv-02177-LPS. (kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett filed by Pivital IP LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/4/19. (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Pivital IP LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pivital IP LLC. ActiveCampaign, LLC served on 11/27/2019, answer due 12/18/2019. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02175-LPS, 1:19-cv-02176-LPS, 1:19-cv-02177-LPS (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to ActiveCampaign, LLC on 11/22/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Pivital IP LLC. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,636,965 B1 (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against ActiveCampaign, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2785709.) - filed by Pivital IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pivital IP LLC v. ActiveCampaign, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pivital IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ActiveCampaign, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
