Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.
Plaintiff: Analog Devices, Inc.
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2019cv02225
Filed: December 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2020 Filing 33 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.'s Disclosure of Asserted Patents and Accused Products filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc..(Wilson, Samantha)
March 9, 2020 Filing 32 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Identifying Defendants' Accused Products and Asserted Patents filed by Analog Devices, Inc..(Egan, Brian)
March 9, 2020 Filing 31 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit a Proposed Protective Order to March 12, 2020 - filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc.. (Wilson, Samantha)
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #30 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to File a Proposed Protective Order to March 9, 2020. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/3/2020. (nms)
March 2, 2020 Filing 30 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to File a Proposed Protective Order to March 9, 2020 - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
February 18, 2020 Filing 29 ORAL ORDER: This matter has been referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for ADR. Counsel are to advise on or before March 10, 2020 by a JOINT EMAIL to Judge Thynge, with a copy to her Judicial Administrator, Ms. Kennedy, their clients interest in mediation and the timing when mediation is preferred with a very brief explanation why. When referencing the time for mediation, counsel rely on certain events in the scheduling order, for example, before claim construction briefing, after the close of discovery, before expert report and the like, they are to include the date(s) on when such event(s) occur. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 2/18/20. (cak)
February 18, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at # https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrderforADR-Mediation.pdf (cak)
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Joinder of Parties due by 7/31/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2020. Discovery due by 3/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 7/21/2021. Answering Brief due 8/18/2021. Reply Brief due 9/10/2021. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 11/18/2020. A Markman Hearing is set for 12/15/2020, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A. A Pretrial Conference is set for 1/7/2022, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A. A 5 day Jury Trial is set for 1/24/2022, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6A (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/14/2020. (nms)
February 14, 2020 Filing 27 PROPOSED Scheduling Order, by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian) Modified on 2/14/2020 (nms).
February 11, 2020 Filing 26 Official Transcript of Scheduling Conference held on 02/07/20 before Judge Richard G. Andrews. Court Reporter/Transcriber Heather M. Triozzi,Email: Heather_Triozzi@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/3/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/13/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/11/2020. (Triozzi, Heather)
February 10, 2020 Filing 25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John R. Lanham, Esquire, Roman A. Swoopes, Esquire, and Jonathan McNeal Smith, Esquire - filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc.. (Wilson, Samantha)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John R. Lanham, Esq., Roman A. Swoopes, Esq., and Jonathan McNeal Smith, Esq., filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/10/2020. (nms)
February 10, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney John R. Lanham for Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.,John R. Lanham for Xilinx, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
February 10, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Roman Swoopes for Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.,for Xilinx, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
February 10, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jonathan McNeal Smith for Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., for Xilinx, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORAL ORDER: As announced at the pretrial conference, and for the reasons stated therein, based on the presumption that there will be separate trials, back-to-back trials and separate claim construction hearings will be scheduled. The scheduling is based on the most likely final decision. There is no need for a final ruling at this time, however, and the motion to separate the counterclaims etc. (D.I. #19 ) is DISMISSED in part as moot and in part as premature. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/7/2020. (nms)
February 7, 2020 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard G. Andrews - Scheduling Conference held on 2/7/2020. Local counsel present for plaintiff: J. Blumenfeld. Local counsel present for defendant: A. Gaza. (Court Reporter Heather Triozzi.) (crb)
February 6, 2020 Filing 23 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #19 MOTION to Separate the Counterclaims Into a Separate Case, or Alternatively, to Separate the Claim Construction Hearings and Trials filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/13/2020. (Gaza, Anne)
February 6, 2020 Filing 22 NOTICE OF SERVICE of 1) Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc.'s and Counterclaim Plaintiff Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Analog Devices, Inc. (Nos. 1-98) and 2) Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc.'s and Counterclaim Plaintiff Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.'s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Analog Devices, Inc. (No. 1-7) filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc..(Wilson, Samantha)
February 5, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Analog Devices, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories to Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. (Nos. 1-28); and (2) Analog Devices, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production to Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. (Nos. 1-90) filed by Analog Devices, Inc..(Blumenfeld, Jack)
February 5, 2020 Filing 20 Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jack B. Blumenfeld, regarding proposed scheduling order. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blumenfeld, Jack) Modified on 2/5/2020 (nms).
February 4, 2020 Set Answering Brief Deadline re #19 MOTION to Separate the Counterclaims Into a Separate Case, or Alternatively, to Separate the Claim Construction Hearings and Trials. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/18/2020. (nms)
February 4, 2020 Filing 19 MOTION to Separate the Counterclaims Into a Separate Case, or Alternatively, to Separate the Claim Construction Hearings and Trials - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) Modified on 2/5/2020 (nms).
February 3, 2020 Filing 18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bita Rahebi, Esquire, Michael A. Jacobs, Esquire, Richard S.J. Hung, Esquire, Hector G. Gallegos, Esquire, and Ryan J. Malloy, Esquire - filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.. (Wilson, Samantha)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bita Rahebi, Esq., Michael A. Jacobs, Esq., Richard S.J. Hung, Esq., Hector G. Gallegos, Esq., and Ryan J. Malloy, Esq., filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/3/2020. (nms)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Counterclaims to March 20, 2020 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Analog Devices, Inc. answer due 3/20/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/3/2020. (nms)
January 31, 2020 Filing 17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Counterclaims to March 20, 2020 - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
January 31, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rose S. Lee,Nicholas R. Fung,Alex S. Yap for Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lak)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Alex S. Yap, Nicholas Rylan Fung and Rose S. Lee, filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/31/2020. (nms)
January 30, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alex S. Yap, Attorney Nicholas Rylan Fung and Attorney Rose S. Lee - filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Xilinx, Inc.. (Wilson, Samantha)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order Setting Rule 16(b) Conference: A Scheduling Conference is set for 2/7/2020, at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Judge Richard G. Andrews (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/22/2020. (nms)
January 21, 2020 Filing 14 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Xilinx Holding Six Limited, Other Affiliate Xilinx, Inc. for Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. filed by Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.. (Gaza, Anne)
January 21, 2020 Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for Xilinx, Inc. filed by Xilinx, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne)
January 21, 2020 Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,975,132 B2; US 7,015,838 B1; US 7,088,767 B1; US 7,116,251 B1; US 7,187,709 B1; US 7,224,184 B1; US 7,280,590 B1; and US 8,548,071 B2 . (Gaza, Anne)
January 21, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Affirmative Defenses and COUNTERCLAIMS against Analog Devices, Inc. by Xilinx, Inc., Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-16)(Gaza, Anne) Modified on 1/21/2020 (nms).
December 23, 2019 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Bita Rahebi for Xilinx, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
December 18, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Stephanie Neely - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Stephanie Neely, filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/18/2019. (nms)
December 17, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Jacobs, Esquire; Richard S.J. Hung, Esquire; Hector G. Gallegos, Esquire; Bita Rahebi, Esquire; and Ryan J. Malloy, Esquire - filed by Xilinx, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne)
December 17, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha G. Wilson on behalf of Xilinx, Inc. (Wilson, Samantha)
December 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Vrana on behalf of Xilinx, Inc. (Vrana, Robert)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Jacobs, Esq., Richard S.J. Hung, Esq., Hector G. Gallegos, Esq., Bita Rahebi, Esq., and Ryan J. Malloy, Esq., filed by Xilinx, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/17/2019. (nms)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Xilinx, Inc. answer due 2/3/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/16/2019. (nms)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian) Modified on 12/15/2019 (nms).
December 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William F. Lee, Cynthia D. Vreeland, Peter M. Dichiara and Nicole M. Fontaine Dooley - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William F. Lee, Cynthia D. Vreeland, Peter M. Dichiara and Nicole M. Fontaine Dooley, filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/13/2019. (nms)
December 11, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
December 5, 2019 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Analog Devices, Inc. (amf)
December 5, 2019 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) SEE ATTACHED LIST. (amf)
December 5, 2019 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf)
December 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Xilinx, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2793608.) - filed by Analog Devices, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-K, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf)
December 5, 2019 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Xilinx, Inc. on 12/5/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (amf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Analog Devices, Inc.
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Represented By: Bita Rahebi
Represented By: Samantha G. Wilson
Represented By: Robert M. Vrana
Represented By: Nicholas R. Fung
Represented By: Alex S. Yap
Represented By: Rose S. Lee
Represented By: Anne Shea Gaza
Represented By: Jonathan McNeal Smith
Represented By: John R. Lanham
Represented By: Roman Swoopes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Represented By: Samantha G. Wilson
Represented By: Nicholas R. Fung
Represented By: Alex S. Yap
Represented By: Rose S. Lee
Represented By: Anne Shea Gaza
Represented By: Jonathan McNeal Smith
Represented By: John R. Lanham
Represented By: Roman Swoopes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?