Kaleasy Tech LLC v. RingCentral, Inc.
| Kaleasy Tech LLC |
| RingCentral, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02329 |
| December 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 7,899,479 B2. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(fms) |
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #19 . (fms) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kaleasy Tech LLC as to RingCenteral, Inc. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST for Oral Argument by RingCentral, Inc. re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (First Amended Complaint). (Moshos, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 REPLY BRIEF re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (First Amended Complaint) filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Moshos, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (First Amended Complaint) filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 4/24/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (First Amended Complaint) filed by RingCentral, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (First Amended Complaint) - filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel (Jeffrey J. Lyons) by RingCentral, Inc. (Lyons, Jeffrey) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Margaret Abernathy,Clement S. Roberts for RingCentral, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT for Infringement of Patent against RingCentral, Inc.- filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Lyons, Jeffrey) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Margaret Abernathy and Clement Seth Roberts of ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP filed by RingCentral, Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/10/2020. (fms)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Margaret Abernathy and Clement Seth Roberts of ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP - filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Lyons, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by RingCentral, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Lyons, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by RingCentral, Inc.. (Lyons, Jeffrey) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew S. Curfman for Kaleasy Tech LLC,Andrew S. Curfman for Kaleasy Tech LLC,Andrew S. Curfman for Kaleasy Tech LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02333-CFC, 1:19-cv-02329-CFC, 1:19-cv-02331-CFC(sam) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (8 in 1:19-cv-02330-CFC, 9 in 1:19-cv-02332-CFC, 7 in 1:19-cv-02329-CFC, 15 in 1:19-cv-02167-CFC, 8 in 1:19-cv-02331-CFC, 8 in 1:19-cv-02328-CFC, 8 in 1:19-cv-02333-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/21/2020. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02167-CFC et al.(nmf)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman - filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complant to March 9, 2020 filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: RingCentral, Inc. answer due 3/9/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/7/2020. (fms)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complant to March 9, 2020 - filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. RingCentral, Inc. served on 12/24/2019, answer due 1/14/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02328-CFC through 1:19-cv-02333-CFC (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to RingCentral, Inc. on 12/23/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 7,899,479 B2. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against RingCentral, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2808329.) - filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
