Kaleasy Tech LLC v. Zoom Video Communication, Inc.
| Kaleasy Tech LLC |
| Zoom Video Communications, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02332 |
| December 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SO ORDERED, re #7 Stipulation to Stay All Deadlines Pending Dismissal filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc., Case stayed. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/5/2020. (fms)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Stay pending Dismissal by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 13, 2020 - filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 13, 2020 filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Zoom Video Communications, Inc. answer due 2/13/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/2/2020. (fms)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. served on 12/24/2019, answer due 1/14/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02328-CFC through 1:19-cv-02333-CFC (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. on 12/23/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 7,899,479 B2. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Zoom Video Communications, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2808332.) - filed by Kaleasy Tech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kaleasy Tech LLC v. Zoom Video Communication, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Laurence Dorsney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kaleasy Tech LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
