Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Onsolve, LLC
Tenaha Licensing LLC |
Onsolve, LLC |
1:2019cv02335 |
December 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Sherry R Fallon |
Leonard P Stark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/14/20. (ntl) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tenaha Licensing LLC as to Onsolve, LLC (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Filing 6 ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is referred to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon to hear and resolve all pre-trial matters up to and including expert discovery matters (but not including summary judgment motions, Daubert motions, pre-trial motions in limine or the pre-trial conference), subject to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and any further Order of the Court. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/3/2020. (ntl) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. Onsolve, LLC served on 12/24/2019, answer due 1/14/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: removed 19-cv-1604-RGA as a related case and added 17-cv-1604-GMS as the correct related case. (rjb) |
Remark: related case listed on civil cover sheet 19-cv-1604-RGA appears to be incorrect and involves a different patent number. Case appears to be related to 17-cv-1604-GMS. (rjb) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (kmd) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,238,869 B2. (kmd) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Onsolve, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2808335.) - filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Tenaha Licensing LLC on 12/23/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Onsolve, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Onsolve, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tenaha Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.