Coding Technologies, LLC v. Kofax, Inc.
| Coding Technologies, LLC |
| Kofax, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02365 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Kofax, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kofax, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/6/2020. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Kofax, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to February 22, 2020 filed by Coding Technologies, LLC, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Kofax, Inc. answer due 2/22/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/16/2020. (nmf)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to February 22, 2020 - filed by Coding Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Coding Technologies, LLC. Kofax, Inc. served on 1/2/2020, answer due 1/23/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-02364-CFC, 1:19-cv-02365-CFC, 1:19-cv-02366-CFC (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Kofax, Inc. on 12/30/2019. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (kmd) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Coding Technologies, LLC. (kmd) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 9,240,008 B2. (kmd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Kofax, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2811692.) - filed by Coding Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coding Technologies, LLC v. Kofax, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Coding Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kofax, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Laurence Dorsney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
