Repsol, S.A. et al v. Maxus Liquidating Trust
Appellee: Maxus Liquidating Trust
Appellant: Repsol E&P USA, Inc., Repsol E&P T&T Limited, Repsol USA Holdings Corp., Repsol Services Company, Repsol Offshore E&P USA, Inc., Repsol, S.A. and Repsol Exploracion, S.A.
Debtor: Maxus Energy Corporation, et al.
Case Number: 1:2019mc00052
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SO ORDERED Granting (D.I. 2 in 19-mc-52-RGA; D.I. 2 in 19-mc-51-RGA) Stipulation to Consolidate. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/13/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-mc-00051-RGA, 1:19-mc-00052-RGA(nms)
March 13, 2019 Filing 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) for the Appellee to file Answering Briefs in response to Appellants' Motions for Leave to Appeal and (ii) for the Appellants to file their reply briefs in support of the Motions to (i) 3/29/2019 and (ii) 4/10/2019 - filed by Maxus Liquidating Trust. (Farnan, Michael)
March 13, 2019 Filing 2 STIPULATION to Consolidate by Maxus Liquidating Trust. (Farnan, Michael)
March 6, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:19-mc-00051-RGA, 1:19-mc-00052-RGA (rjb)
March 4, 2019 Set Answering Brief Deadline re #1 MOTION for Leave to Appeal. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/18/2019. (nms)
March 4, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Appeal - filed by Repsol E&P T&T Limited, Repsol E&P USA, Inc., Repsol Exploracion, S.A., Repsol Offshore E&P USA, Inc., Repsol Services Company, Repsol USA Holdings Corp., Repsol, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, #2 Order on Appeal, #3 Letter Opinion, #4 Bankruptcy Court Transmittal)(nmg)
March 4, 2019 Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (nmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Repsol, S.A. et al v. Maxus Liquidating Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Maxus Liquidating Trust
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol E&P USA, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol E&P T&T Limited
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol USA Holdings Corp.
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol Services Company
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol Offshore E&P USA, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol, S.A.
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Repsol Exploracion, S.A.
Represented By: Robert J. Dehney
Represented By: Daniel Bryan Butz
Represented By: Curtis S. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Maxus Energy Corporation, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?