Conduent Education Services, LLC et al v. Chery
| Conduent Education Services, LLC and Access Funding 2015-1, LLC. |
| Jeffrey Chery |
| 1:2019mc00229 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO QUASH: The Motion to Quash (D.I. #1 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/15/2019. (nms)
|
| CASE CLOSED per entry of D.I. #4 . (nms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 2 OPENING BRIEF in Support D.I. #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Access Funding 2015-1, LLC., Conduent Education Services, LLC. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/3/2019. (sam) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoena - filed by Access Funding 2015-1, LLC., Conduent Education Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Miscellaneous Filing Fee $47 paid. Rec# 32402)(sam) |
| Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial case assignment. (sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
