Castlemorton Wireless, LLC v. Datto, Inc.
| Castlemorton Wireless, LLC |
| Datto, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00058 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 20, 2020 (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Datto, Inc. answer due 3/20/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/4/2020. (nms)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00057-RGA, 1:20-cv-00058-RGA, 1:20-cv-00059-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 20, 2020 - filed by Datto, Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 3/4/2020 (nms). |
|
SO ORDERED re #5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Compliant until March 9, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Datto, Inc. answer due 3/9/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/31/2020. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Compliant until March 9, 2020 - filed by Castlemorton Wireless, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen) Modified on 1/31/2020 (dlw). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00057-MN, 1:20-cv-00058-MN, 1:20-cv-00059-MN, 1:20-cv-00060-MN (rjb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Castlemorton Wireless, LLC. Datto, Inc. served on 1/16/2020, answer due 2/6/2020. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,835,421. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Datto, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2825646.) - filed by Castlemorton Wireless, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Datto, Inc. on 1/15/2020. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castlemorton Wireless, LLC v. Datto, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Datto, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Ying |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Castlemorton Wireless, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stephen B. Brauerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
