Rothschild et al v. Monsanto Company
James Rothschild and Audrey Rothschild |
Monsanto Company |
1:2020cv00310 |
March 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark : : Case transferred from Delaware has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:20-cv-02640, filed 04/16/2020. (rwc) |
Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRASNFER ORDER by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the Northern District of California to become part of MDL 2741. (nmf) |
Case transferred to the Northern District of California to become part of MDL 2741. (nmf) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Monsanto Company - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2867297.) - filed by James Rothschild, Audrey Rothschild. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Monsanto Company on 3/2/2020. (Summons mailed to Counsel). (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.