Superior Play Systems, Inc. v. PlayCore, Inc. et al
| Superior Play Systems, Inc. |
| Superior Recreational Products and PlayCore, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00321 |
| March 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Superior Play Systems, Inc. as to PlayCore, Inc. and Superior Recreational Products (Lennon, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to PlayCore, Inc. on 3/6/2020. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) Reg. No. 3,922,404; Reg. No. 3,992,879; and Reg. No. 5,752,797. (amf) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against PlayCore, Inc., Superior Recreational Products - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2868787) - filed by Superior Play Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-I, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
| No Summons Issued. (amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
