Rosenblatt v. TiVo Corporation et al
| Jordan Rosenblatt |
| Dan Moloney, James E. Meyer, Alan L. Earhart, TiVo Corporation, Xperi Corporation, XRAY Merger Sub Corporation, Eddy W. Hartenstein, Raghavendra Rau, XRAY-TWOLF HoldCo Corporation, TWOLF Merger Sub Corporation, Laura J. Durr, Loria B. Yeadon, Dave Shull and Glenn W. Welling |
| 1:2020cv00327 |
| March 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Laura J. Durr, Alan L. Earhart, Eddy W. Hartenstein, James E. Meyer, Dan Moloney, Raghavendra Rau, Dave Shull, TWOLF Merger Sub Corporation, TiVo Corporation, Glenn W. Welling, XRAY Merger Sub Corporation, XRAY-TWOLF HoldCo Corporation, Xperi Corporation, Loria B. Yeadon - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2869298.) - filed by Jordan Rosenblatt. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
