Gray v. City of Philadelphia
Theodore Cecil Gray, III and Mr. Theodore Cecil Gray, Jr., III |
City of Philadelphia |
1:2020cv00343 |
March 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: #4 Order resent to West Northwest 26th Street and P.O. Box 26838. (kmd) |
Filing 5 Return of Undeliverable Mail sent to Theodore Cecil Gray, III. (Return to Sender. Insufficient Address. Unable to Forward.) (mal) |
Filing 4 ORDER, denying request to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiff shall either (1) provide fully complete and legible responses to all questions, or (2) pay the $400.00 filing fee within 30-days or the case shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/16/2020. (nmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against City of Philadelphia - filed by Theodore Cecil Gray Jr., III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Theodore Cecil Gray Jr., III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.