Aether Therapeutics Inc. v. AstraZeneca AB et al
| Aether Therapeutics Inc. |
| Nektar Therapeutics, LLC, AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00381 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Chandran B. Iyer, Michael A. Siem, Oded Burger, Ronald M. Daignault, and Richard Juang for Aether Therapeutics Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d), Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (sam) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to respond to the Complaint to June 1, 2020 - filed by Aether Therapeutics Inc.. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran B. Iyer, Michael A. Siem, Oded Burger and Richard Juang - filed by Aether Therapeutics Inc.. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to respond to the Complaint to June 1, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: AstraZeneca AB answer due 6/1/2020; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP answer due 6/1/2020; Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc. answer due 6/1/2020; Nektar Therapeutics, LLC answer due 6/1/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/8/2020. (dlw)
|
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran B. Iyer, Michael A. Siem, Oded Burger and Richard Juang filed by Aether Therapeutics Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/8/2020. (dlw)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aether Therapeutics Inc.. Nektar Therapeutics, LLC served on 3/26/2020, answer due 4/16/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aether Therapeutics Inc.. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP served on 3/24/2020, answer due 4/14/2020. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by Aether Therapeutics Inc. (kmd) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,713,488 B2; US 8,748,448 B2; US 8,883,817 B2; US 9,061,024 B2. (kmd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc., Nektar Therapeutics, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2879498.) - filed by Aether Therapeutics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
| Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP on 3/18/2020; Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc. on 3/18/2020; Nektar Therapeutics, LLC on 3/18/2020. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
