CTAF Solutions, LLC v. Honeywell International Inc.
CTAF Solutions, LLC |
Honeywell International Inc. |
1:2020cv00535 |
April 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s). (Attachments: #1 Stipulation of Dismissal)(mdb) |
CASE CLOSED per D.I. #11 . (dlw) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. dba BENDIXKING by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. Honeywell International Inc. served on 4/23/2020, answer due 6/15/2020. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Pro Hac Vice Attornesy John T. Johnson and Michael F. Autuoro for Honeywell International Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to June 15, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Honeywell International Inc. answer due 6/15/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/15/2020. (dlw) |
SO ORDERED re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John T. Johnson and Michael F. Autuoro filed by Honeywell International Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/15/2020. (dlw) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John T. Johnson and Michael F. Autuoro - filed by Honeywell International Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to June 15, 2020 - filed by Honeywell International Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow, and Andrew S. Curfman for CTAF Solutions, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00535-MN, 1:20-cv-00500-MN, 1:20-cv-00503-MN(sam) |
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman, #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/30/2020. (dlw) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman - filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00533-MN, 1:20-cv-00534-MN, 1:20-cv-00535-MN (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (sam) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (sam) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number US 10,389,396. (sam) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT- filed with Jury Demand against Honeywell International Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2904048.) - filed by CTAF Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Related cases)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.