Be Labs, Inc. v. Wavlink Technology Limited
| BE Labs, Inc. |
| Wavlink Technology Limited |
| 1:2020cv00559 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORAL ORDER: Defendant's answer was due to be filed on 6/18/2020 (see D.I. #8 ), and to date none has been filed. Now the Plaintiff shall file a status letter within 3 days from the entry of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/22/2020. (nms)
|
| Filing 9 Letter to Judge Andrews, from Raeann Warner, regarding status. (Warner, Raeann) Modified on 5/26/2020 (nms). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint or Otherwise Plead - filed by BE Labs, Inc.. (Warner, Raeann) Modified on 5/26/2020 (nms). |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint or Otherwise Plead (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Wavlink Technology Limited answer due 6/18/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/26/2020. (nms)
|
|
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER: Defendant's answer was due to be filed on 5/19/2020 (see D.I. #6 ), and to date none has been filed. Now the Plaintiff shall file a status letter within 3 days from the entry of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/21/2020. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00558-RGA, 1:20-cv-00559-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by BE Labs, Inc.. Wavlink Technology Limited served on 4/28/2020, answer due 5/19/2020. (Warner, Raeann) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Be Labs, Inc. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,827,581 ;9,344,183. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- filed with Jury Demand against Wavlink Technology Limited - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2906899.) - filed by Be Labs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Be Labs, Inc. v. Wavlink Technology Limited | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Raeann Warner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wavlink Technology Limited | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
