Conformis, Inc. v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
| Conformis, Inc. |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Tornier, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00562 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME time for the Defendants to move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to July 9, 2020 filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/22/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME time for the Defendants to move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to July 9, 2020 - filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Angela Oliver for Conformis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Tiffany M. Cooke for Conformis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (sam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Diana M. Sangalli and Thomas W. Sankey for Tornier, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Stephanie Sivinski for Conformis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas W. Sankey filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc., #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Diana M. Sangalli filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc., #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Anthony J. Fitzpatrick filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/20/20. (ntl)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Charles M. Jones, II for Conformis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (sam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Anthony J. Fitzpatrick for Tornier, Inc., for Wright Medical Technology, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney John R. Emerson for Conformis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas W. Sankey - filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Diana M. Sangalli - filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Anthony J. Fitzpatrick - filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the Defendants to move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to June 25, 2020 filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/19/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the Defendants to move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to June 25, 2020 - filed by Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Renck on behalf of Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Renck, Richard) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John R. Emerson, Charles M. Jones, II, Stephanie N. Sivinski, Tiffany M. Cooke, and Angela Oliver filed by Conformis, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/6/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Conformis, Inc.. Tornier, Inc. served on 5/5/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Conformis, Inc.. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. served on 5/5/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John R. Emerson, Charles M. Jones, II, Stephanie N. Sivinski, Tiffany M. Cooke, and Angela Oliver - filed by Conformis, Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| No Summons Issued. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,460,304 ;9,295,482 ;8,623,026 ;9,326,780. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Tornier, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2907490.) - filed by Conformis, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
