Radent Licensing LLC v. Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC
| Radent Licensing LLC |
| Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC |
| 1:2020cv00579 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Radent Licensing LLC. Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC served on 4/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer the Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC answer due 7/20/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/12/2020. (nms)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer the Complaint - filed by Radent Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 5/12/2020 (nms). |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow for Radent Licensing LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00578-RGA, 1:20-cv-00579-RGA(kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow, filed by Radent Licensing LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/6/2020. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00578-RGA, 1:20-cv-00579-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by Radent Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (myr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Radent Licensing LLC. (myr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,018,184 B2 ;US 8,310,184 B2 ;US 8,541,966 B2. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT filed with Jury Demand against Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 311-2909191.) - filed by Radent Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Radent Licensing LLC v. Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Radent Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rohm Semiconductor U.S.A., LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
