Abbatiello v. Legrow et al
Anthony A. Abbatiello |
Matthew Keating, Brian Daly, T-Mobile U.S.A Law Enforcement Relations, Michael Campbell, Michael Siebert, Kathleen Jennings, Nathaniel McQueen, Kelly Breen, Julie Finocchiaro, Abigail M. Legrow, Melisa Reed and James P. Doherty |
1:2020cv00586 |
April 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Letter/Motion requesting Authorization form be corrected. Petitioner claims that partial filing fee is incorrect and based off of false assessment. (lak) Modified on 6/24/2020 (fms). |
Filing 10 Authorization by Anthony A. Abbatiello requesting Prison Business Office to disburse payments to the Clerk of the Court. (copy of assessment order and authorization to Prison Business Office) (Additional attachment(s) : #1 Cover Letter) (myr). |
Filing 9 ORDER granting Motion to Proceed IFP. Filing Fee of $350.00 Assessed. An initial partial filing fee of $23.68 shall be required. Plaintiff shall return the attached payment authorization within 30 days. Failure to return payment authorization shall result in dismissal of action without prejudice. (Copy to pltf. with Mag. Consent Form)( Notice of Compliance deadline set for 6/26/2020.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Authorization Form) (nmf) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Order re #7 Order, Set Deadlines, - filed by Anthony A. Abbatiello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Compliance)(apk) |
Filing 7 ORDER, Although the Complaint indicates that the matter is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, in reading the filing, it could also be construed as a petition seeking habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On or before June 12, 2020, Plaintiff shall advise the Court if this case is to proceed as a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 or as a petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Plaintiff is placed on notice that the case will be dismissed without prejudice should he fail to timely respond to this Order. ORDER, Setting Deadlines: ( Notice of Compliance deadline set for 6/12/2020.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/12/2020. (nmf) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of #5 MOTION Emergency Motion to preserve evidence - filed by Anthony A. Abbatiello.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (lak) |
Filing 5 Emergency MOTION to Preserve Evidence - filed by Anthony A. Abbatiello. (myr) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/30/2020) (lak). |
Filing 4 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 with Jury Demand against Michael Campbell, Brian Daly, James P. Doherty, Julie Finocchiaro, Kathleen Jennings, Matthew Keating, Abigail M. Legrow, Nathaniel McQueen, Melisa Reed, Michael Siebert, T-Mobile U.S.A Law Enforcement Relations - filed by Anthony A. Abbatiello. (IFP Provided, No Fee Paid)(Civil Cover sheet Incomplete). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter)(myr) |
Filing 2 Trust Fund Account Statement by Anthony A. Abbatiello (myr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Anthony A. Abbatiello. (myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.