B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
| B.E. Technology, L.L.C. |
| Twitter, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00621 |
| May 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group for Twitter, Inc. filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 10
DECLARATION re (8 in 1:20-cv-00621-LPS) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , (8 in 1:20-cv-00622-LPS) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Sonal N. Mehta by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2)(Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 9
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Twitter, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/13/2020. (Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Sonal N. Mehta, Nora Q.E. Passamaneck, Cristina Salcedo for Twitter, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sonal N. Mehta, Thomas G. Sprankling, Nora Q.E. Passamaneck and Cristina Salcedo filed by Twitter, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/8/20. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sonal N. Mehta, Thomas G. Sprankling, Nora Q.E. Passamaneck and Cristina Salcedo - filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME re: Defendants Answer to Complaint to through and including June 29, 2020 - filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME re: Defendants Answer to Complaint to through and including June 29, 2020 filed by Twitter, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/28/20. (ntl)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Mark Raskin for B.E. Technology, L.L.C. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark S. Raskin, Robert A. Whitman, Michael DeVincenzo, Andrea Pacelli, Charles Wizenfeld and Elizabeth Long filed by B.E. Technology, L.L.C. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/18/20. (ntl)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00621-LPS, 1:20-cv-00622-LPS (rjb)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by B.E. Technology, L.L.C.. Twitter, Inc. served on 5/8/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark S. Raskin, Robert A. Whitman, Michael DeVincenzo, Andrea Pacelli, Charles Wizenfeld and Elizabeth Long - filed by B.E. Technology, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Mark S. Raskin, #2 Certification of Robert A. Whitman, #3 Certification of Andrea Pacelli, #4 Certification of Charles Wizenfeld, #5 Certification of Elizabeth Long, #6 Certification of Michael DeVincenzo)(Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
No Summons Issued. (mal)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,549,410 ;8,549,411 ;8,769,440. (mal)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Twitter, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-2922182.) - filed by B.E. Technology, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
