Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Ingeteam Inc.
Nitetek Licensing LLC |
Ingeteam Inc. |
1:2020cv00716 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 21, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Ingeteam Inc. answer due 8/21/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/21/2020. (dlw) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 21, 2020 - filed by Ingeteam Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) |
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William H. Mandir and J. Warren Lytle, Jr. filed by Ingeteam Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/18/2020. (dlw) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth Ann Swadley on behalf of Ingeteam Inc. (Swadley, Beth) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William H. Mandir and J. Warren Lytle, Jr. - filed by Ingeteam Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Ingeteam Inc. to respond to Plaintiff Nitetek Licensing LLC's Complaint to July 22, 2020 - filed by Ingeteam Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) |
SO ORDERED re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Ingeteam Inc. to respond to Plaintiff Nitetek Licensing LLC's Complaint to July 22, 2020 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Ingeteam Inc. answer due 7/22/2020). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/17/2020. (dlw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00716-MN, 1:20-cv-00717-MN (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (sam) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Nitetek Licensing LLC. (sam) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 7,020,105 ;U.S. 6,661,783. (sam) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT - filed with Jury Demand against Ingeteam Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-2959341.) - filed by Nitetek Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Ingeteam Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ingeteam Inc. | |
Represented By: | Anne Shea Gaza |
Represented By: | Beth Ann Swadley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nitetek Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.