Novo Nordisk Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
Plaintiff: Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S
Defendant: Sandoz Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv00747
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Colm F Connolly
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2020 Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Novartis AG for Sandoz Inc. filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick)
July 31, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Sandoz Inc..(Gattuso, Dominick)
July 14, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Candice J. Kwark for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
July 14, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gretchen P. Miller for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
July 13, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Thomas J. Filarski for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
July 13, 2020 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Robert F. Kappers for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas J. Filarski, Robert F. Kappers, Candice Jaesun Kwark, Gretchen P. Miller, and Ryann M. Muir filed by Sandoz Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/13/2020. (fms)
July 10, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas J. Filarski, Robert F. Kappers, Candice Jaesun Kwark, Gretchen P. Miller, and Ryann M. Muir - filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick)
June 22, 2020 Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Sandoz Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to July 31, 2020 - filed by Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Sandoz Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to July 31, 2020 filed by Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Sandoz Inc. answer due 7/31/2020. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/22/2020. (fms)
June 10, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
June 5, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and related papers served on Sandoz Inc. on June 5, 2020, filed by Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
June 3, 2020 Filing 6 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Novo Holdings A/S for Novo Nordisk A/S; Corporate Parent Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. for Novo Nordisk Inc. filed by Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (nmg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,268,343 B1; 7,762,994 B2; 8,114,833 B2; 8,579,869 B2; 8,846,618 B2; 9,265,893 B2. (nmg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: 4/21/2020. Date of Expiration of Patent: See Attached.Thirty Month Stay Deadline: 10/21/2022. (nmg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed against Sandoz Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-2970535.) - filed by Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Novo Nordisk Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Novo Nordisk Inc.
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Novo Nordisk A/S
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandoz Inc.
Represented By: Dominick T. Gattuso
Represented By: Candice J. Kwark
Represented By: Thomas J. Filarski
Represented By: Gretchen P. Miller
Represented By: Robert F. Kappers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?