Post v. TerraForm Power, Inc. et al
| John Post |
| Brian Lawson, Brookfield Renewable Corporation, Harry Goldgut, Carolyn Burke, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P., Richard Legault, Sachin Shah, TerraForm Power NY Holdings, Inc., Christian Fong, Mark McFarland, 2252876 Alberta ULC and TerraForm Power, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00927 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00926-CFC, 1:20-cv-00927-CFC (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against 2252876 Alberta ULC, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P., Brookfield Renewable Corporation, Carolyn Burke, Christian Fong, Harry Goldgut, Brian Lawson, Richard Legault, Mark McFarland, Sachin Shah, TerraForm Power, Inc., TerraForm Power NY Holdings, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $400, receipt number ADEDC-3048269.) - filed by John Post. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
| No Summons Issued. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
