NXP USA, Inc. v. Heritage IP LLC
| NXP USA, Inc. |
| Heritage IP LLC |
| 1:2020cv00972 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to complaint to 09/22/2020 filed by Heritage IP LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/10/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to complaint to 09/22/2020 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 09/07/2020 filed by Heritage IP LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/26/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 09/07/2020 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 08/27/2020 filed by Heritage IP LLC, #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME re: Answer to Complaint to and including August 27, 2020 filed by NXP USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/14/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 08/27/2020 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME re: Answer to Complaint to and including August 27, 2020 - filed by NXP USA, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NXP USA, Inc.. Heritage IP LLC served on 7/23/2020, answer due 8/13/2020. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (mal) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Freescale Semiconductor Holdings V, Inc., Corporate Parent NXP B.V., Corporate Parent NXP Semiconductors N.V. for NXP USA, Inc. filed by NXP USA, Inc.. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,854,067 ;7,221,200. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - filed against Heritage IP LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3078072.) - filed by NXP USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NXP USA, Inc. v. Heritage IP LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NXP USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kelly E. Farnan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Heritage IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
