Puff Corporation v. Kandypens, Inc.
Puff Corporation |
Kandypens, Inc. |
1:2020cv00976 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Benjamin F. Sidbury as co-counsel.. (Vrana, Robert) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Colin D. Dailey for Puff Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Daniel A. Crowe for Puff Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (sam) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel A. Crowe and Attorney Colin D. Dailey - filed by Puff Corporation. (Vrana, Robert) |
SO ORDERED, re #19 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel A. Crowe and Attorney Colin D. Dailey filed by Puff Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/15/2020. (nmf) |
Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim / Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Claim filed by Kandypens, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim / Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Claim - filed by Kandypens, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 16 REPLY BRIEF re #10 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California filed by Kandypens, Inc.. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing of Amended Complaint by Puff Corporation re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 14 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California filed by Puff Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kandypens, Inc.- filed by Puff Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 5, #2 Exhibit 6 - 10, #3 Exhibit 11 - 12)(Gaza, Anne) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Graham D. Gibson by Kandypens, Inc.. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #10 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California filed by Kandypens, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance A)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - filed by Kandypens, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kandypens, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/27/2020. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Kandypens, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sean J. O'Hara for Kandypens, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Eric P. Schroeder for Puff Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Damon J. Whitaker for Puff Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean J. O'Hara filed by Kandypens, Inc., #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin F. Sidbury, Attorney Eric P. Schroeder and Attorney Damon J. Whitaker filed by Puff Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/3/2020. (fms) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean J. O'Hara - filed by Kandypens, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification by Counsel To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin F. Sidbury, Attorney Eric P. Schroeder and Attorney Damon J. Whitaker - filed by Puff Corporation. (Vrana, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Puff Corporation. Kandypens, Inc. served on 7/23/2020, answer due 8/13/2020. (Vrana, Robert) |
Filing 4 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (sam) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Puff Corporation. (sam) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Kandypens, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3078795.) - filed by Puff Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5, #2 Exhibit 6-10, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.