Moxchange LLC v. Sonim Technologies Inc.
| Moxchange LLC |
| Sonim Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01127 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 11/23/2020 filed by Moxchange LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/10/20. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Answer to Complaint to 11/23/2020 - filed by Moxchange LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Moxchange LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01123-LPS, 1:20-cv-01124-LPS, 1:20-cv-01125-LPS, 1:20-cv-01126-LPS, 1:20-cv-01127-LPS(kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (6 in 1:20-cv-01124-LPS) (6 in 1:20-cv-01123-LPS) (6 in 1:20-cv-01126-LPS) (6 in 1:20-cv-01127-LPS) (6 in 1:20-cv-01125-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett filed by Moxchange LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/4/20. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01123-LPS, 1:20-cv-01124-LPS, 1:20-cv-01125-LPS, 1:20-cv-01126-LPS, 1:20-cv-01127-LPS (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Moxchange LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Chong, Jimmy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01123-LPS, 1:20-cv-01124-LPS, 1:20-cv-01125-LPS, 1:20-cv-01126-LPS, 1:20-cv-01127-LPS (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (apk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Moxchange LLC. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,233,664 ;7,376,232 ;7,860,254. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Sonim Technologies, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3156673.) - filed by Moxchange LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 List of Related Cases)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moxchange LLC v. Sonim Technologies Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sonim Technologies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Moxchange LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
