Guada Technologies LLC v. Milacron LLC
Guada Technologies LLC |
Milacron LLC |
1:2020cv01143 |
August 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Hillenbrand, Inc., Other Affiliate Blackrock, Inc. for Milacron LLC filed by Milacron LLC. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand, and COUNTERCLAIMS against Guada Technologies LLC by Milacron LLC.(Anderson, Jeremy) Modified on 10/22/2020 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Milacron LLC answer due 10/21/2020). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/15/2020. (nms) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Time - filed by Guada Technologies LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 9/15/2020 (nms). |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Guada Technologies LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Guada Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification)(Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 9/3/2020 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett, filed by Guada Technologies LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/3/2020. (nms) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01143-RGA, 1:20-cv-01144-RGA (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Guada Technologies LLC. (nmg) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,231,379. (nmg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Milacron LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3160233.) - filed by Guada Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guada Technologies LLC v. Milacron LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Milacron LLC | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Douglas Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Guada Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.