Curtis v. Rosetta Stone Inc. et al
| Marcy Curtis |
| Patrick W. Gross, Laurence Franklin, Aedhmar Hynes, John Hass, David Nierenberg, Empower Merger Sub Inc., George A. Logue, Steven P. Yankovich, Kate Eberle Walker, Rosetta Stone Inc., Cambium Holding Corp. and Jessie Woolley-Wilson |
| 1:2020cv01288 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marcy Curtis (Long, Brian) |
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #3 . (nms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Cambium Holding Corp., Kate Eberle Walker, Empower Merger Sub Inc., Laurence Franklin, Patrick W. Gross, John Hass, Aedhmar Hynes, George A. Logue, David Nierenberg, Rosetta Stone Inc., Jessie Woolley-Wilson, Steven P. Yankovich - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $400, receipt number ADEDC-3222947.) - filed by Marcy Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
| No Summons Issued. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
