McGoveran et al v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al
| Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine and Christine McGoveran |
| Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01399 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Stephanos Bibas |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 75
ORDER, I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendant Pindrop's motion to dismiss with prejudice (D.I. #52 ) plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (D.I. #47 ). I DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE all counts against Pindrop. If Plaintiffs wish to amend their complaint, they SHALL file a motion for leave to amend within 30 days of the date of this order. That motion SHALL contain clean and redlined versions of the proposed complaint, plus a letter brief no more than 5 single-spaced pages explaining why amendment would not be futile in light of the Biometric Information Privacy Act's financial-institution exception. I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendant Amazon's motion to dismiss with prejudice (D.I. #50 ) plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (D.I. #47 ). I DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts I, III, and IV against Amazon. I DENY Amazon's motion to dismiss Count II. If plaintiffs wish to file an amended complaint, they SHALL do so within 30 days of the date of this order. No motion for leave to amend is required. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 03/29/2023. (apk)
|
|
Filing 74
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 03/29/2023. (apk)
|
|
Filing 73
ORDER granting D.I. #72 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Joshua Katz. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 03/20/2023. (apk)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joshua A. Katz for Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, and Joseph Valentine added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 72
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua Katz - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Joshua Katz)(Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 71
Letter to The Honorable Stephanos Bibas from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding standing arguments - re 68 Oral Order,,. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 70
Letter to Honorable Stephanos Bibas from Ronald P. Golden III regarding Plaintiffs' request for Leave to File Amended Complain - re 68 Oral Order,,. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 69
Letter to The Honorable Stephanos Bibas from Jody C. Barillare regarding Article III Standing - re 68 Oral Order,,. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 68
ORAL ORDER, Defendant Pindrop Security, Inc. has argued that Plaintiffs' Counts I, III, and prayer for injunctive relief against Pindrop should be dismissed for lack of standing. D.I. #53 . It appears that the standing analysis for these claims would be the same for Defendant Amazon Web Services, Inc. So I ORDER Plaintiffs and Amazon to simultaneously submit letter briefs addressing this issue by 12pm EDT on 3/10/23. The letter briefs shall be no longer than 5 single-spaced pages. ORDERED by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 3/1/23. (twk)
|
|
Filing 67
NOTICE of by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #66 Notice (Other) / Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Pindrop's Notice of Supplemental Authority (D.I. 66) (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 66
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority by Pindrop Security, Inc. re #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 65
OBJECTIONS by Amazon Web Services, Inc. to #64 Notice (Other), to Plaintiffs' Notice of Subsequent Authority. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 64
NOTICE of Subsequent Authorities Further Supporting Denial of Motions to Dismiss (D.I. 50, 52) by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 63
STATEMENT re #60 Notice (Other), #61 Notice (Other), Response to Plaintiffs' Notices of Supplemental Authority by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 62
STATEMENT re #61 Notice (Other), -- Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority -- by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 61
NOTICE of Subsequent Authorities Further Supporting Denial of Motions to Dismiss (D.I. 50, 52) by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 60
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 59
REPLY BRIEF re #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 58
REPLY BRIEF re #50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 57
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME. The time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss is extended until May 18, 2022 and the time for Defendants to file their reply briefs in support of their motions is extended until June 8, 2022. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 6/1/2022. (srs)
|
|
Filing 56
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/25/2022. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 55
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/25/2022. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 54
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended until May 18, 2022 and the time for Defendants to file their reply briefs in support of their motions is extended to June 8, 2022 - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 53
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #52 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Pindrop Security, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3)(Dellinger, Megan)
|
|
Filing 52
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan)
|
|
Filing 51
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #50 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A to E)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 50
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 49
ORDER: DESIGNATION OF CIRCUIT JUDGE TO HOLD A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE CIRCUIT, designating and assigning the Honorable Stephanos Bibas of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Signed by Judge Michael A Chagares, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on 3/14/2022. (rjb)
|
|
Case Reassigned to Judge Stephanos Bibas, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Please include the initials of the Judge (SB) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 48
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the First Amended Complaint to April 4, 2022 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #48 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the First Amended Complaint to April 4, 2022 filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/28/22. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 47
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amazon Web Services, Inc., Pindrop Security, Inc.- filed by Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 46
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend (D.I. 37), the associated letter briefing (D.I. 36, 39, 40, 41, 42), and Plaintiffs' notice of subsequent authority (D.I. 45), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. Given that the case before this Court remains at an early stage and under the applicable standards, the Court is required to take Plaintiffs' well-pled factual allegations as true and to grant leave to amend freely in the interests of justice. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 15(a). While Defendants have, throughout the course of their litigation with Plaintiffs - both here and in Illinois - provided reason to be skeptical of Plaintiffs' allegations, they have provided no meritorious basis on which the Court should deny Plaintiffs the opportunity to proceed on their proposed amended complaint. At this point, the Court is not persuaded that Plaintiffs' proposed amendment is futile, as it contains new allegations raising at least a plausible inference that the alleged misconduct occurred principally and substantially in Illinois. For example, Plaintiffs now allege that AWS and Pindrop interacted directly with Plaintiffs in Illinois. (See, e.g., D.I. 36-2 paras. 71-76, 121-24, 129-31) Plaintiffs did not unduly delay, as they did not face the same extraterritoriality defense in Illinois, reasonably believed they could defeat Defendants' original motions to dismiss in this Court, and then sought leave to amend in a timely manner after this Court's prior ruling. While it would have been preferable for Plaintiffs to have met and conferred with Defendants before filing the instant motion, it was not unreasonable for Plaintiffs to have viewed their motion as dispositive, given that this case would end if the Court did not permit amendment. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint no later than February 17, 2022. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/14/22. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 45
NOTICE of Subsequent Authority Further Supporting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (D.I. 36-37) by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #37 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, #36 Letter (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 44
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding offer to confer. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 43
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Ronald P. Golden III regarding Request for Telephone Conference to Address Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend - re #40 Letter, #37 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, #41 Letter, #42 Letter, #39 Letter, #36 Letter. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 42
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Stephen B. Brauerman regarding Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to File Amended Complaint - re SO ORDERED,. (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 41
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Stephen B. Brauerman regarding Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to File Amended Complaint - re SO ORDERED,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #38 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. to File their Answering Letter Briefs in Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to November 8, 2021 and for Plaintiffs to file their Reply letter to Nov. 17, 2021 filed by Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/9/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 40
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Jody C. Barillare regarding opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to file Amended Complaint - re #37 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, #38 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. to File their Answering Letter Briefs in Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to November 8, 2021 and for Plaintiffs to file their Rep. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 39
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding response to Plaintiffs' October 28, 2021 letter - re #36 Letter. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 38
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. to File their Answering Letter Briefs in Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to November 8, 2021 and for Plaintiffs to file their Reply Letter Briefs in Support of their Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to November 17, 2021 - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 37
MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 36
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Ronald P. Golden III regarding Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to File Amended Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER re #34 Memorandum Opinion -- #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Pindrop Security, Inc. is GRANTED; #15 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc. is GRANTED; #32 MOTION for Leave to File a Response to Defendant Pindrop Security, Inc.'s Notice of Subsequent Authority (D.I.30) filed by Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 34
MEMORANDUM OPINION re pending motions (D.I. 12, 15, and 32). Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 33
STATEMENT re #30 Notice (Other) Plaintiffs' [Proposed] Response to Defendant Pindrop Security, Inc.'s Notice of Subsequent Authority by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 32
MOTION for Leave to File a Response to Defendant Pindrop Security, Inc.'s Notice of Subsequent Authority (D.I.30) - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 31
Official Transcript of Telephonic Oral Argument held on September 15, 2021 before District Judge Leonard P. Stark. Court Reporter Brian Gaffigan, email: gaffigan@verizon.net. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or ordered/purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10/12/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/22/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/20/2021.(bpg)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Leonard P. Stark - Telephone Conference held on 9/15/2021. (Court Reporter B. Gaffigan.) (ntl)
|
|
Filing 30
NOTICE of Subsequent Authority by Pindrop Security, Inc. re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE of Subsequent Authority Further Supporting Denial of Motions to Dismiss (D.I. 12, 15) by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Subsequent Authorities Further Supporting Motion to Dismiss by Amazon Web Services, Inc. re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 27
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Telephone Argument scheduled for September 15 will begin at 12:00 PM. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/13/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 26
Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding dial-in information for September 15, 2021 teleconference. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 25
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the teleconference argument scheduled for September 15, 2021 will begin at 1:00 p.m. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/31/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 24
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will hear oral argument on the pending motions to dismiss (D.I. 12, 15) on September 15 at 11:30 a.m. Plaintiffs will have 40 minutes to present argument, and Defendants will also have 40 minutes to present argument (to be divided between them however they choose). The hearing will be conducted remotely by teleconference. No later than September 13, the parties shall provide chambers with the necessary information for the Court to connect to the hearing and shall also docket a public letter providing the necessary information to allow any member of the public to attend the hearing without having the ability to speak or otherwise interrupt the proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than September 14 at 4:00 p.m., the parties shall submit to the Court and serve on each other copies of any slides or demonstratives to which they may refer during the hearing. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/17/21. (ntl)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 24 has been deleted from the docket as it was docketed in the wrong civil action. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Subsequent Authorities Further Supporting Denial of Motions to Dismiss (D.I. 12, 15) by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Golden, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY BRIEF re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 21
REPLY BRIEF re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #20 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendants Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. to file their reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss to February 5, 2021 filed by Pindrop Security, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/29/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 20
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendants Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Pindrop Security, Inc. to file their reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss to February 5, 2021 - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 19
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 1/29/2021. (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 1/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 17
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for Amazon Web Services, Inc. filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 16
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 12/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A to F)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 14
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 13
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Pindrop Security, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 12/28/2020. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Elizabeth Herrington and Raechel K. Kummer for Amazon Web Services, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Diana M. Torres for Pindrop Security, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew Bloomer for Pindrop Security, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Elizabeth Herrington and Raechel Keay Kummer filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Diana Torres, Andrew B. Bloomer, Catherine L. Fitzpatrick, and Amelia Bailey filed by Pindrop Security, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/12/20. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Elizabeth Herrington and Raechel Keay Kummer - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Elizabeth Herrington, #2 Certification of Raechel Keay Kummer)(Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Diana Torres, Andrew B. Bloomer, Catherine L. Fitzpatrick, and Amelia Bailey - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Pindrop to respond to the Complaint and for responses/replies to Pindrop's response to dates as outlined in the stipulation filed by Pindrop Security, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/5/20. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to December 11, 2020 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Jody Barillare on behalf of Amazon Web Services, Inc. (Barillare, Jody)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to December 11, 2020 filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/3/20. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Pindrop to respond to the Complaint and for responses/replies to Pindrop's response to dates as outlined in the stipulation - filed by Pindrop Security, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Andrew D. Schlichter, Joel Rohlf, Alexander L. Braitberg for Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew D. Schlichter, Joel Rohlf, and Alexander L. Braitberg filed by Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 10/29/20. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew D. Schlichter, Joel Rohlf, and Alexander L. Braitberg - filed by Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez, Joseph Valentine. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Andrew D. Schlichter, #2 Certification of Alexander L. Braitberg, #3 Certification of Joel Rohlf)(Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez. Pindrop Security, Inc. served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez. Amazon Web Services, Inc. served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. (Brauerman, Stephen)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
|
|
Filing 3
Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (kmd)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Amazon Web Services, Inc., Pindrop Security, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $400, receipt number ADEDC-3271916.) - filed by Joseph Valentine, Christine McGoveran, Amelia Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
