Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company LLC and PF PRISM IMB B.V. |
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Sun Pharma Global FZE |
1:2020cv01407 |
October 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER, on or before February 5, 2021, counsel for the parties shall confer regarding coordination of the cases and submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court or otherwise advise the Court that a separate scheduling conference is needed. ORDER, Setting Deadlines: ( Notice of Compliance deadline set for 2/5/2021.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/17/2020. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01392-CFC et al.(nmf) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendants to respond to the Complaint to January 19, 2021 filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc.,Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Sun Pharma Global FZE answer due 1/19/2021; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. answer due 1/19/2021; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. answer due 1/19/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/10/2020. (fms) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendants to respond to the Complaint to January 19, 2021 - filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company LLC. (Dellinger, Megan) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM IMB B.V.: For Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. waiver sent on 10/20/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Dellinger, Megan) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM IMB B.V.: For Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. waiver sent on 10/20/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Dellinger, Megan) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM IMB B.V.: For Sun Pharma Global FZE waiver sent on 10/20/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Dellinger, Megan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 6 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sam) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Pfizer Inc. for PF PRISM IMB B.V., Warner-Lambert Company LLC filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company LLC. (sam) |
Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,723,730 B2. (sam) |
Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: September 23, 2020. Date of Expiration of Patent: February 8, 2034. (sam) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3277335.) - filed by Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM IMB B.V. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.