Aristors Licensing, LLC. v. Genasys, Inc.
| Aristors Licensing, LLC. |
| Genasys, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01566 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s). (Attachments: #1 Stipulation of Dismissal)(mdb) |
Filing 15
SO ORDERED re #14 Stipulation of Dismissal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/12/2021. (dlw)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Aristors Licensing, LLC. (deBruin, David) Modified on 1/12/2021 (dlw). |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla, Noel F. Chakkalakal for Genasys, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Noel F. Chakkalakal filed by Genasys, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/11/2021. (dlw)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Noel F. Chakkalakal - filed by Genasys, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel by Genasys, Inc. (DiGiovanni, Francis) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Genasys, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Aristors Licensing, LLC. by Genasys, Inc..(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Genasys, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/19/2021. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Genasys, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Complaint to January 15, 2021 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Genasys, Inc. answer due 1/15/2021). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/11/2020. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Complaint to January 15, 2021 - filed by Genasys, Inc.. (DiGiovanni, Francis) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aristors Licensing, LLC.. Genasys, Inc. served on 11/25/2020, answer due 12/16/2020. (deBruin, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (apk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Aristors Licensing, LLC.. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,013,734. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Genasys, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3345988.) - filed by Aristors Licensing, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
