Matthews v. Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc. et al
Ryan Chase Matthews |
Carl Sparks, Michael Hines, Vale Merger Sub, Inc., David Hoffman, Mark Nunnelly, Anthony Dinovi, Roland Smith, Irene Chang Britt, Nigel Travis, Linda Boff, Raul Alvarez, Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc. and Inspire Brands, Inc. |
1:2020cv01583 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ryan Chase Matthews (Serra, Gina) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
No Summons Issued. (myr) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Raul Alvarez, Linda Boff, Irene Chang Britt, Anthony Dinovi, Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc., Michael Hines, David Hoffman, Inspire Brands, Inc., Mark Nunnelly, Roland Smith, Carl Sparks, Nigel Travis, Vale Merger Sub, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3350253.) - filed by Ryan Chase Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.