Coretek Licensing LLC v. FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc.
| Coretek Licensing LLC |
| FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01597 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Parties to Submit Case Management to 02/19/2021 - filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED D.I. #17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Parties to Submit Case Management to 02/19/2021 filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/22/2021. (dlb)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Adil Shaikh filed by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/22/2021. (dlb)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla and Adil Shaikh - filed by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #11 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. by Coretek Licensing LLC.(Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Motion to Dismiss to 01/26/2021 - filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Motion to Dismiss to 01/26/2021 filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/6/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burke's Case Management Checklist ("Checklist"). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file the following: (i) a copy of the Checklist, indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order, which is consistent with Judge Burke's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order - Patent" up through and including paragraph number 16 (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule leading up to but not including the case dispositive motion stage of the case) and that is consistent with paragraphs 15-22 of Judge Noreika's "Patent Scheduling Order - Non-ANDA" (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule from the case dispositive motion stage through post-trial motions); and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and both Scheduling Orders can be found on Judge Burke's/Judge Noreika's portions of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/23/2020. (mlc)
|
| Filing 12 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Coretek Licensing LLC by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc..(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/5/2021. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Coretek Licensing LLC. FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. served on 12/1/2020, answer due 12/22/2020. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke to hear and resolve all pre-trial matters up to and including expert discovery matters (but not including summary judgment motions, Daubert motions, pre-trial motions in limine or the pre-trial conference), subject to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and any further Order of the Court. All subsequent filings in this action shall be captioned as follows: Civil Action No. 20-1597-MN-CJB. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/3/2020. (dlw)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew S. Curfman for Coretek Licensing LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01607-MN-CJB, 1:20-cv-01594-MN-CJB, 1:20-cv-01597-MN-CJB, 1:20-cv-01604-MN-CJB, 1:20-cv-01606-MN-CJB(kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED re (6 in 1:20-cv-01604-MN), (6 in 1:20-cv-01606-MN), (6 in 1:20-cv-01594-MN), (6 in 1:20-cv-01607-MN), (6 in 1:20-cv-01597-MN) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/3/2020. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01594-MN, 1:20-cv-01597-MN, 1:20-cv-01604-MN, 1:20-cv-01606-MN, 1:20-cv-01607-MN (rjb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew S. Curfman - filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (myr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (myr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,861,512 ;US 9,173,154 ;US 9,369,575 ;US 9,591,551. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT filed with Jury Demand against FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-3353220.) - filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coretek Licensing LLC v. FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FreeConferenceCall.com, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Douglas Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Coretek Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Curfman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
