Ravgen, Inc. v. Progenity, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ravgen, Inc.
Defendant: Progenity, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv01734
Filed: December 21, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Hall
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to March 23, 2021 - filed by Progenity, Inc.. (Liston, Ian)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, #9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to March 23, 2021 (*Reset Answer Deadline: Progenity, Inc. answer due 3/23/2021). ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/17/2021. (ceg)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order ORAL ORDER: The case is now referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall for all purposes through the case dispositive motion deadline. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/13/2021. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01644-RGA, 1:20-cv-01646-RGA, 1:20-cv-01730-RGA, 1:20-cv-01734-RGA(nms)
January 8, 2021 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian D. Matty,Deborah J. Mariottini for Ravgen, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
January 8, 2021 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael Ling for Ravgen, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
January 8, 2021 Pro Hac Vice Attorney John M. Desmarais,Jamie L. Kringstein,Kerri-Ann Limbeek for Ravgen, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
January 5, 2021 Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to February 23, 2021 - filed by Progenity, Inc.. (Liston, Ian)
January 5, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John M. Desmarais, Kerri-Ann Limbeek, Jamie L. Kringstein, Brian D. Matty, Michael Ling, and Deborah J. Mariottini - filed by Ravgen, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Progenity, Inc. answer due 2/23/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/5/2021. (nms)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re (7 in 20-cv-1734-RGA; 8 in 20-cv-1730-RGA) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John M. Desmarais, Kerri-Ann Limbeek, Jamie L. Kringstein, Brian D. Matty, Michael Ling, and Deborah J. Mariottini, filed by Ravgen, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/5/2021. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01730-RGA, 1:20-cv-01734-RGA(nms)
December 29, 2020 Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Ravgen, Inc.. (Farnan, Michael)
December 23, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-01730-RGA, 1:20-cv-01734-RGA (rjb)
December 22, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ravgen, Inc.. Progenity, Inc. served on 12/22/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Farnan, Michael)
December 22, 2020 Filing 4 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (mal)
December 21, 2020 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,727,720 B2 ;US 7,332,277 B2. (mal)
December 21, 2020 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
December 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Progenity, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3411179.) - filed by Ravgen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ravgen, Inc. v. Progenity, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ravgen, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Deborah J. Mariottini
Represented By: Michael Ling
Represented By: John M. Desmarais
Represented By: Kerri-Ann Limbeek
Represented By: Brian D. Matty
Represented By: Jamie L. Kringstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progenity, Inc.
Represented By: Ian Robert Liston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?