Tunnel IP LLC v. McIntosh Laboratory, Inc.
| Tunnel IP LLC |
| McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01762 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement filed by Tunnel IP LLC, Case stayed. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/18/2021. (fms)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement - filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to 02/18/2021 - filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer complaint to 02/18/2021 filed by Tunnel IP LLC, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. answer due 2/18/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/14/2021. (fms)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow for Tunnel IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow filed by Tunnel IP LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/6/2021. (nmf)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tunnel IP LLC. McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. served on 12/29/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,916,877. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT- filed with Jury Demand against McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3417664.) - filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tunnel IP LLC v. McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tunnel IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
