Arthrodesis Technology LLC v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
| Arthrodesis Technology LLC |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00011 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Wright Medical Technology, Inc. - filed by Arthrodesis Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Brauerman, Stephen) Modified on 2/25/2021 (dlw). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/25/2021: #4 Redline Comparison) (dlw). |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Seth H. Ostrow and Robert P. Feinland for Arthrodesis Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
SO ORDERED re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Seth H. Ostrow and Robert P. Feinland filed by Arthrodesis Technology LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/4/2021. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Seth H. Ostrow and Robert P. Feinland - filed by Arthrodesis Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Seth H. Ostrow, #2 Certification of Robert P. Feinland)(Brauerman, Stephen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Arthrodesis Technology LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen) |
| No Summons Issued. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,579,293. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Wright Medical Technology, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3442715.) - filed by Arthrodesis Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arthrodesis Technology LLC v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arthrodesis Technology LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ronald P. Golden, III |
| Represented By: | Stephen B. Brauerman |
| Represented By: | Seth H. Ostrow |
| Represented By: | Robert P. Feinland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
