Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Coolpad Technologies Inc.
| Koninklijke KPN N.V. |
| Coolpad Technologies Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00043 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED D.I. #64 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason Xu filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/14/2022. (dlb)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jason L. Xu for Coolpad Technologies Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 65 CLAIM Construction Chart by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 64 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason Xu - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Day, John) |
| Filing 63 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Coolpad Technologies Inc. (Day, John) |
| Filing 62 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories; (ii) Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to Defendant's First Set of Requests for Production; and (iii) Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to Coolpad filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Adam Tisdall for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #59 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Adam Tisdall filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/25/2022. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 61
ORDER re 55 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED and #21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/22/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 60 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendants' Proposed Constructions for U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 filed by Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi Inc..(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 59 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Adam Tisdall - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendants' Proposed Terms for Construction From U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 filed by Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi Inc..(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 57 ANSWER to #20 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Koninklijke KPN N.V. and Defendant's First Set of Requests for Production to Plaintiff Koninklijke KPN N.V. filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc..(Day, John) |
|
Filing 55
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims III-V (the "claims") of Defendants' First Amended Counterclaims ("FAC"), (D.I. #21 ("Motion"); D.I. #22 at 3), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. #22 ; D.I. #25 ; D.I. #28 ), and having considered the relevant legal standards, see IOENGINE, LLC v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., Civil Action No. 18-452-WCB, 2019 WL 2121395, at *2 (D. Del. May 15, 2019), hereby recommends that, for the reasons that follow, the Motion be DENIED: (1) With regard to Plaintiff's assertion that the claims fail because Defendant does not sufficiently allege that the patent-in-suit is essential, (D.I. 22 at 6-8), the Court disagrees. Although at the case dispositive stage Defendant will need to prove essentiality by way of objective findings (i.e., whether practicing the relevant standards in fact leads to infringement of the patent), see 3G Licensing, S.A. v. Blackberry Ltd., Civil Action No. 17-82-LPS, D.I. 326 at 7 (D. Del. Oct. 2, 2020), at the pleading stage it need only point to facts that render it plausible that the patent is essential. And the Court does not see why Plaintiff's alleged repeated statements that it "belie[ved]" that the patent "may be" essential, or that the patent "is an essential patent" or that the patent "ha[s] been recognized as essential" cannot fit that bill; Plaintiff's statements in this regard are indeed facts plausibly suggesting that, later at the proof stage, Defendant may be able to show (based on objective evidence) that the patent actually is essential. (D.I. 20 at 11-12 at paras. 5-7; D.I. 23, ex. 2); (2) With respect to Plaintiff's assertion that the claims fail to plausibly establish a FRAND-related breach of contract, (D.I. 22 at 8-13), while the Court agrees that what is pleaded is not particularly robust, it concludes that Defendant has done just enough to get by. Here, the Court need only assess Defendant's theory that Plaintiff breached its FRAND obligations by demanding unfair or discriminatory royalties. Defendant alleges that Plaintiff did this when it provided proposed rates that were much higher than what other entities are paying pursuant to KPNs licensing agreements with them[.]" (D.I. 20 at 17 at para. 29) While it would have been better if the FAC included more details about these proposed rates or about the agreements with other entities, Rule 8 (not Rule 9(b)) applies here, and similar allegations to these have been found sufficient to state a FRAND-based breach claim. See Research In Motion Ltd. v. Motorola, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 788, 797 (E.D. Tex. 2008); Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, No. 11-178-bbc, 2011 WL 7324582, at *11 (W.D. Wis. June 7, 2011).; and (3) As for Plaintiff's argument that Defendant failed to sufficiently identify a contractual provision that was breached, (D.I. 22 at 13-16), the Court is candidly not convinced that the breach claim could be solely based on Clause 6.1 of the ETSI IPR Policy alone, for reasons stated by Plaintiff. (D.I. 22 at 15-16; see also D.I. 23, ex. 4 at 34-35) But the Court does think that: (a) a plausible breach of Plaintiff's ETSI Declaration (which incorporates by reference Clause 6.1) could be asserted here (i.e., that to the extent that the patent is essential, Plaintiff had to be prepared to grant a license under FRAND terms, and that Plaintiff was not in fact prepared to do so), (D.I. 22 at 15; D.I. 25 at 16, 17; see also D.I. 23, ex. 2); and (b) the FAC can be read to actually assert such claims, (D.I. 20 at 15-16 at paras. 15, 18-19; id. at 20-22 at paras. 50, 56, 61) (*Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2022). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/11/2022. (ceg)
|
| Filing 54 NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Edward J. Delman as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 53 NOTICE OF SERVICE of KPN's Disclosure of Initial Infringement Contentions filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 52
Stipulated Supplemental PROTECTIVE ORDER between non-party Qualcomm Inc., Plaintiff, and Defendants. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/8/2021. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB(dlb)
|
| Filing 51 PROPOSED ORDER [Proposed] Stipulated Supplemental Protective Order Between Non Party Qualcomm Incorporated, Plaintiff, and Defendants by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Coolpad Technologies Inc.'s Core Technical Document Production and Sales Figures for Accused Products filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc..(Day, John) |
| Filing 49 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Defendant Coolpad Technologies Inc.'s Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Delaware Default Standard for Discovery Paragraph 3; (2) Defendant's Responses and Objections to Koninklijke KPN N.V.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9); and (3) Defendant's Responses to Koninklijke KPN N.V.'s Requests for Production (Nos. 1-86) filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc..(Day, John) |
| Filing 48 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures under Section 3 of the Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information and (ii) Plaintiff's Supplemental Rule 26 Disclosures filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 47 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 46 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Coolpad Technologies Inc.'s Initial Disclosures filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc..(Mayo, Andrew) |
|
Filing 45
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/25/2021. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(dlb)
|
| Filing 44 PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Protective Order by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE of Subpoenas to Qualcomm Incorporated and MediaTek USA Inc. by Koninklijke KPN N.V. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #42 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jasmine W. Zhu filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/19/2021. (dlb)
|
| Filing 42 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jasmine W. Zhu - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Mayo, Andrew) |
|
Filing 41
ORAL ORDER: The Court denies without prejudice to refile upon payment of required fees D.I. #34 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jasmine W. Zhu filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/18/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 40
ORAL ORDER: If during the history of this case, Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s) jointly wish to schedule a form of alternative dispute resolution ("ADR"), such as mediation, with Judge Burke, they should contact chambers by e-mail at Deborah_Benyo@ded.uscourts.gov or by phone. Additionally, if either side wishes to speak ex parte with Judge Burke regarding ADR matters, they may contact chambers via e-mail or by phone to arrange a time for a call. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/18/2021. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(dlb)
|
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Identification of Accused Products and Form of Damages filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 38 Official Transcript of Telephone Conference held on October 4, 2021 before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Court Reporter Brian Gaffigan, email: gaffigan@verizon.net. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or ordered/purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 11/3/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/15/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/11/2022.(bpg) |
|
Filing 37
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Joinder of Parties due by 12/1/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2021. Fact Discovery completed by 10/21/2022. Expert Discovery due by 2/3/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 3/3/2023. A Motion Hearing is set for 5/23/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Leonard P. Stark Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 5/27/2022. A Markman Hearing is set for 6/10/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. A Pretrial Conference is set for 8/4/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard P. Stark. A Jury Trial is set for 8/14/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard P. Stark.. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/13/2021. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(mlc)
|
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at # https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrderforADR-Mediation.pdf Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(Taylor, Daniel) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Coolpad and Bullitt and (ii) Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production to Coolpad and Bullitt filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 35 PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Rule 16 Teleconference/Case Management Conference held on 10/4/2021. The Court ordered the parties to submit a revised joint scheduling order by no later than the close of business on October 12, 2021. (Clerk: Bryant-Alvarez) Appearances: B. Farnan and A. Healy for Plaintiff; J. Tigan, B. Cangro, J. Day, J. Zhu, and E. Fenton for Defendants. (Court Reporter Brian Gaffigan.) Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(dlb) |
| Filing 34 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jasmine W. Zhu - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Mayo, Andrew) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Yufeng Ma for Coolpad Technologies Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk) |
| REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(dlb) |
|
Filing 33
Order Setting Telephonic Scheduling Conference: The Court, having been recently referred this case, has reviewed the parties' August 23, 2021 Proposed Scheduling Order in which the parties have disputes. NOW THEREFORE, a Case Management/Scheduling Teleconference is set for October 4, 2021 at 2:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. By no later than September 30, 2021, the parties shall jointly provide the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, with a dial-in number via e-mail to use for the call. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/10/2021. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS-CJB(dlb)
|
| MOTION REFERRED: #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #15 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims Motion referred to Christopher J. Burke.(dlb) |
|
Filing 32
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke to hear and resolve all pre-trial matters up to and including expert discovery matters (but not including summary judgment motions, Daubert motions, pre-trial motions in limine or the pre-trial conference), subject to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and any further Order of the Court. ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/9/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS (ntl)
|
| Filing 31 PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order re (30 in 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 14 in 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 19 in 1:21-cv-00044-LPS) Order,, by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Honorable Leonard P. Stark)(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 30
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposal, including a proposal for the length and timing of trial, to the Court no later than August 23, 2021. The parties are to review the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Stark, New Patent Procedures). ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/9/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS (ntl)
|
| Filing 29 Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Brian E. Farnan regarding Request for Scheduling Conference. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 28 REPLY BRIEF re #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Michael) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #27 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to file its reply brief in support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss Coolpad's First Amended Counterclaims to 7/1/2021 filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/29/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 27 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to file its reply brief in support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss Coolpad's First Amended Counterclaims to 7/1/2021 - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 26 REDACTED VERSION of #25 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Day, John) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: Exhibits at D.I. #25 replaced per counsel's request. (kmd) |
| Filing 25 [SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 6/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Mayo, Andrew) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/22/2021) (kmd). |
| Filing 24 REDACTED VERSION of #23 Declaration by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-5)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 23 [SEALED] DECLARATION re #22 Opening Brief in Support of Tamar Lusztig by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 22 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 6/18/2021. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Russell Rennie for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS. (kmd) |
| Filing 20 AMENDED ANSWER to #13 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, Amended COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Russell Rennie - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (19 in 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 9 in 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 15 in 1:21-cv-00046-LPS, 17 in 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 13 in 1:21-cv-00045-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Russell Rennie filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/20/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims to May 21, 2021 filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/13/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims to May 21, 2021 - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION re #16 Opening Brief in Support of Tamar Lusztig by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/14/2021. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 14 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate Yulong Infotech, Inc., Other Affiliate Coolpad Group Limited for Coolpad Technologies Inc. filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Day, John) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Koninklijke KPN N.V. by Coolpad Technologies Inc..(Day, John) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Timothy Vann Pearce, Jr for Coolpad Technologies Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney T. Vann Pearce, Jr. and Yufeng Ma - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Day, John) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney T. Vann Pearce, Jr. and Yufeng Ma filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/10/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 MOTION to Compel (Unopposed) filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/9/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel (Unopposed) - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Day, John) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Tamar E. Lusztig for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS. (kmd) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Tamar Lusztig - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Edward J. Delman for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS.(kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (10 in 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 9 in 1:21-cv-00046-LPS, 10 in 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 7 in 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 9 in 1:21-cv-00043-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Tamar Lusztig filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/17/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re (8 in 1:21-cv-00046-LPS, 9 in 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 8 in 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 9 in 1:21-cv-00045-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Edward J. Delman filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/12/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Edward J. Delman - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 12, 2021 filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/10/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 12, 2021 - filed by Coolpad Technologies Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Alexandra G. White an dTom DelRosario for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00042-LPS, 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 1:21-cv-00045-LPS, 1:21-cv-00046-LPS.(kmd) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andres C. Healy for Koninklijke KPN N.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS et al.(kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (5 in 1:21-cv-00041-LPS, 6 in 1:21-cv-00046-LPS, 6 in 1:21-cv-00043-LPS, 6 in 1:21-cv-00042-LPS, 6 in 1:21-cv-00044-LPS, 6 in 1:21-cv-00045-LPS) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra G. White, Andres C. Healy, and Tom DelRosario filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/29/21. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS et al. (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra G. White, Andres C. Healy, and Tom DelRosario - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. Coolpad Technologies Inc. served on 1/19/2021, answer due 2/9/2021. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00041-LPS through 1:21-cv-00046-LPS (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate Capital Research and Management Company, Other Affiliate America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V. for Koninklijke KPN N.V. filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,212,662 B1. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Infringement of Patent- filed with Jury Demand against Coolpad Technologies Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3466656.) - filed by Koninklijke KPN N.V. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
| No Summons Issued. (sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
