Unirac, Inc. v. EcoFasten Solar, LLC et al
| Unirac, Inc. |
| Esdec, Inc. and EcoFasten Solar, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00059 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to March 25, 2021 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: EcoFasten Solar, LLC answer due 3/25/2021; Esdec, Inc. answer due 3/25/2021). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/23/2021. (dlw)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to March 25, 2021 - filed by EcoFasten Solar, LLC, Esdec, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Biggs, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Philip W. Woo for Unirac, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00058-MN, 1:21-cv-00059-MN. (kmd) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service Executed by Unirac, Inc.. Esdec, Inc. served on 2/2/2021, answer due 2/23/2021. (Renck, Richard) |
| Filing 8 Return of Service Executed by Unirac, Inc.. EcoFasten Solar, LLC served on 2/2/2021, answer due 2/23/2021. (Renck, Richard) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Andrew G. Strickland, Ryan P. Gentes, Caleb A. Hatch for Unirac, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00058-MN, 1:21-cv-00059-MN. (kmd) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Philip W. Woo, Esq., Andrew G. Strickland, Esq., Ryan P. Gentes, Esq., and Caleb A. Hatch, Esq. - filed by Unirac, Inc.. (Renck, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Letter to the Clerk of the Court from Richard L. Renck regarding related cases. (Renck, Richard) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Philip W. Woo, Esq., Andrew G. Strickland, Esq., Ryan P. Gentes, Esq., and Caleb A. Hatch, Esq. filed by Unirac, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/27/2021. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00058-MN, 1:21-cv-00059-MN (rjb) |
| Remark: per DI# 6, linked 21-cv-58 and 21-cv-59 as related Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00058-UNA, 1:21-cv-00059-UNA(rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Unirac Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Unirac Investors, LLC, Corporate Parent Tenex Capital Partners II, LP for Unirac, Inc. filed by Unirac, Inc.. (nmg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,160,273; 9,584,062. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against EcoFasten Solar, LLC, Esdec, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3476286.) - filed by Unirac, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
