Sonohm Licensing LLC v. SDI Technologies Inc.
| Sonohm Licensing LLC |
| SDI Technologies Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00079 |
| January 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 04/21/2021 - filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 04/21/2021 filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/19/21. (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 03/22/2021 filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/17/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 03/22/2021 - filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/4/21. (ntl)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Sonohm Licensing LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Chong, Jimmy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. SDI Technologies Inc. served on 1/28/2021, answer due 2/18/2021. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (amf) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (amf) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,651,207. (amf) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against SDI Technologies Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3489392) - filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sonohm Licensing LLC v. SDI Technologies Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sonohm Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SDI Technologies Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
