One World Technologies, Inc. et al v. Q.E.P. Co., Inc.
| Techtronic Cordless GP and One World Technologies, Inc. doing business as Techtronic Industries Power Equipment |
| Q.E.P. Co., Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00117 |
| January 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to April 21, 2021 - filed by Q.E.P. Co., Inc.. (Flynn, Michael) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to April 21, 2021 filed by Q.E.P. Co., Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Q.E.P. Co., Inc. answer due 4/21/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/17/2021. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 22, 2021 filed by Q.E.P. Co., Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Q.E.P. Co., Inc. answer due 3/22/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/9/2021. (fms)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 22, 2021 - filed by Q.E.P. Co., Inc.. (Flynn, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Techtronic Cordless GP, One World Technologies, Inc.. Q.E.P. Co., Inc. served on 1/29/2021, answer due 2/19/2021. (Dudash, Amy) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Jason C. White and Nicholas A. Restauri for One World Technologies, Inc. and Techtronic Cordless GP added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason C. White and Nicholas A. Restauri filed by One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Cordless GP. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/4/2021. (fms)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason C. White and Nicholas A. Restauri - filed by One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Cordless GP. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Jason C. White, #2 Certification of Nicholas A. Restauri)(Dudash, Amy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., Corporate Parent Techtronic Industries Company, Ltd., Corporate Parent Gainful Plan Trading Ltd., Corporate Parent TTI Finance Ltd. for One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Cordless GP filed by One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Cordless GP. (nmg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,710,256; D851,475; D894,711. (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Q.E.P. Co., Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3497355.) - filed by Techtronic Cordless GP, One World Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
