Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC
Peloton Interactive, Inc. |
Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC |
1:2021cv00160 |
February 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Susan Y. Tull - filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc.. (Flynn, Michael) |
SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Susan Y. Tull, filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/1/2021. (nms) |
Filing 10 REPLY BRIEF re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Claim Splitting filed by Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Claim Splitting filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/22/2021. (Flynn, Michael) |
Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Claim Splitting, filed by Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Schladweiler, Benjamin) Modified on 3/1/2021 (nms). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Claim Splitting - filed by Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) Modified on 3/1/2021 (nms). |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. (Flynn, Michael) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (nmg) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,639,521 B2. (nmg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3509984.) - filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Peloton Interactive, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Flynn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC | |
Represented By: | Benjamin J. Schladweiler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.