Graco Inc. et al v. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC
Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota Inc. |
Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC |
1:2021cv00245 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C., Nathan S. Mammen and Karthik Ravishankar of KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP - filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Carlisle Companies Incorporated for Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/29/2021. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
SO ORDERED re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C., Nathan S. Mammen and Karthik Ravishankar of KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/15/2021. (dlw) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph A. Herriges and Conrad A. Gosen - filed by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc.. (Gupta Fiorella, Nitika) |
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph A. Herriges and Conrad A. Gosen filed by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/11/2021. (dlw) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Joseph A. Herriges and Conrad A. Gosen for Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd) |
SO ORDERED re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 15, 2021 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC answer due 4/15/2021). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/11/2021. (dlw) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to April 15, 2021 - filed by Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc.. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC served on 2/23/2021, answer due 3/16/2021. (Gupta Fiorella, Nitika) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Graco Inc. for Graco Minnesota Inc. - filed by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc. (kmd) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) RE46,002; US 7,527,172. (kmd) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $402, receipt number ADEDC-3536287.) - filed by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
No Summons Issued. (kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.