In re: Ursa Operating Company LLC
| 1:2021cv00495 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/30/2022. (dlw)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and this matter is withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as the parties are unable to agree upon a briefing schedule (D.I. 23 at 3), the Court ORDERS the following briefing schedule: Appellant Brief due by 6/4/2021. Appellee Brief due by 7/9/2021. Appellant Reply Brief due by 7/23/2021. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/10/2021. (dlw)
|
|
Filing
23
Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withdrawn from mandatory mediation. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 5/6/2021. (Taylor, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/4/2021. (dlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re: Ursa Operating Company LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
